DAB: Was
there a point in your life that prompted your desire to write or have you
always wanted to be an author?
CLM: I remember as a little kid always wanting to
be a writer. That or a lawyer, as somewhere I had decided that lawyers were the
best dressed of any professional. I don’t even know where I heard the word
“writer,” but I did and it stuck. Perhaps because I have been such an avid
reader all my life, and my parents likely explained to me that the name on the
cover of the book was the name of the writer. Once I made the connection
between telling stories in my head and putting them to paper, that was that.
DAB: Where
do you come up with ideas for your novels?
CLM: My novels walk into my life, fully formed.
The characters are as real to me as any living being, and I am frequently
surprised by them. They behave differently than I thought they would. They
reject choices I make for them. Sometimes they tell me their stories in
advance, and arrive in my mind like an old friend, someone whom I have known
all my life. Other times, they string me along, only revealing portions of
themselves to me as they see fit.
Much of the plot
details are told to me by the characters as they describe their lives, but the
details, observations, and descriptions are often products of my own
imagination and lived experiences.
DAB: I
can really relate to that. What was the
catalyst for this novel’s premise?
CLM: I wanted to investigate the question of
suffering- why do we suffer? Why do we suffer more or less than others even
when we share similar circumstances? How does suffering manifest across
different personalities and in different cultures? I wanted to look at the
similarities and discrepancies between internal and external, mental and
material suffering, as this is a question that I have asked myself all my life.
The characters
introduced themselves to me, fully formed and sentient. The locations were
chosen from my own experiences and interests. I was living in a small village
in Japan
at the time of writing The First Noble Truth, and I knew that the story would
take place there. Krista, my second protagonist, unveiled herself to me slowly,
and only told me stories of her past as I wrote them, whereas Machiko was an
open book from the start.
DAB: Interesting
– I like what you’re saying here about the exploration of suffering. I think we as humans expend so much energy
trying to avoid the unavoidable when so much can be learned from it. Do you have a character(s) in your novel with
whom you closely identify?
CLM: Many of my friends and people who know me
have made assumptions about my own identity based on the characters I have
written. Whilst I would say I understand and empathize with both Machiko and
Krista, I do not see them as reflections of myself. There is a derivative
identity inherent to them, as they are the products of my mind, but I would
compare this to the correlation between parents and children- an outsider may
see similar mannerisms, facial features, or personality traits, but is often
surprised at the extraordinary differences and how very far, no matter how
similar they look, an apple can fall from the tree.
DAB: Were
there any characters you found difficult to write?
CLM: As I said, my characters introduce themselves
to me and I know them entirely, even if they don’t show themselves completely,
I know that they are full and real and I only have to stay present, pay
attention, and listen and I will have a fully fledged character on paper.
I find
background characters can be more difficult. It is tempting to use them as plot
devices, which gives them an artificial and inappropriate feel. Usually all the
characters in my books are as real to me as any person on the street, more so,
in fact, but occasionally there will be a shadowy, more linear sub-character
who agrees to partake in the story but doesn’t want much attention.
DAB: I
agree. It’s important for an author to
develop three-dimensional, organic characters instead of cardboard cutout
puppets. Speaking of which, do you ever
have difficulty writing from the point-of-view of a member of the opposite sex?
CLM: Both of these characters are female, as am I,
so this was not an issue for this book. There are scenes from the perspective
of Kyoto Sensei, or my wonderful Vermont
farmer, but they were as human and immediate as the women were.
Interestingly, I
usually meet more female characters than male, but I have observed a male
protagonist who entered my mind a year ago and has since taken up residence. He
will be the sole narrator of his novel, and I am interested to see how we
communicate with each other. We have very little in common, so I’m curious why
he chose me to write his story, but I will do my best with him as I would with
any other character.
DAB: I’ll
be interested in hearing how that goes. Who
is your favorite character in your novel, and why?
CLM: How could I chose this? I love Machiko for
her sensitivity, her kindness, and nervous desire to please, which stems only
from goodness. I love Krista for her strength and resilience. Both women are
brave as hell, and I didn’t expect them to be. They outwitted me and impressed
me with their strength at every turn. My heart aches for their difficulties,
but I have complete faith in their abilities.
Sumi chan is a
source of great love for me, as is Kyoto Sensei. I wrote both of those
characters thinking of dear friends of mine, and I think my love for them
extends towards my love for their literary avatars.
DAB: How
long did it take for you to craft this novel?
CLM: I had the idea in Japan,
I toyed with it whilst backpacking for a year across the Africa
continent. I wrote a few chapters in Oxford, but
finally settled down to pound it out in a year during my time in Dharamsala, India.
The writing, comprised of several drafts with weeks of space in between, took a
little over seven months. The thinking and planning of the novel, waiting for
characters to show themselves and for scenarios to unfold, took several years.
DAB: Tell
us about the moment you received your first real fan correspondence.
CLM: I received an email from a woman who knew me
during my Master’s degree. I’m embarrassed to say that I didn’t remember her.
She was very gracious in her praise, and said that she was so happy to see
someone who she knew, at least peripherally, to have completed a novel, as it
made her feel that the same achievement was within her own grasp.
I absolutely
understand what she meant. I am a farmer’s daughter and, despite my prolific
travels, I have never met a novelist. I have met many people who wanted to
write, who said they were working on something, but no one who had ever
finished anything. I felt like an alien, with this desire in me, and I was
terrified that I would be lost in a sea of “one day, when I have time…”
That email made
me realize that we have so many different impacts on one another. I can never
guarantee someone will like my book, but I can guarantee that I have worked as
hard as possible on it, and written the best book that I could. Similarly, no
one can guarantee success or monumental impact from one’s work, and hoping for
it strikes me as volatile and dangerous, as if one’s sense of self worth
depends on the opinions of others. Instead, I can only hope to have a positive
impact, no matter how big or small. Her email told me that my book did have a
positive impact, at least on her, although perhaps not in the way one would
expect.
DAB: There's
the eternal debate whether to outline or not. What is your preference?
CLM: I like outlining because it appeals to my
academic nature, but I’ve found that my outlines never end up approximating the
story itself. Rather, I think they are effective tools for managing myself and
my time, as opposed to organizing the story. I find outlining, much like making
lists, is very soothing. It gives me a direction to go in, a plan, something on
paper to soothe the blank-page blues. However, ultimately the story tells
itself to me.
I have a mystery
series that I will be starting this summer, after a few other projects. I
wonder if I will find an outline to be a more necessary tool for this different
genre. In order to keep track of plot details, where I’ve dropped little hints,
etc., perhaps I will find myself using outlines more frequently. Then again,
the characters of the mystery series have already introduced themselves to me,
so perhaps the storyline will unfold much in the same way as that of my
literary fiction. I’m curious to see how it goes.
DAB: I
love the ‘blank-page blues’ moniker. So
very true. Good luck on that new mystery
series too. Do you belong to a critique
group? If so, tell us a bit about it.
CLM: I do not. I have tried critique groups once
or twice and never felt I got much out of them. I have a large group of beta
readers, and I find their feedback to be very helpful. Perhaps this is because
I am not an auditory learner, and reading criticism is easier for me to
understand than listening to it.
Also, I am a
ravenous reader of every possible genre. I have strong opinions on what I read,
and I engage in critical analysis to try and understand these reactions of
mine. However, I do not consider myself a critic. I have never taken a writing
class, and I hope I will never be in a position to teach a writing class, as I
feel teaching art is much like critiquing it: God bless the people who can, but
I have no idea how to do it myself. For this reason, I am not sure how
beneficial I would be to a critique group.
DAB: How
do you handle negative feedback about your novel(s)?
CLM: I think negative feedback about one’s work is
the same as negative feedback about one’s self- it has little to do with the
supposed object of the feedback, and more to do with the subject offering the
feedback. This is not meant as a condescending or dismissive comment, but
rather a statement of fact. A book is a book. Words on a page will not change
when they are in my hands, or in yours. However, my life, my reading, my
personality, my preferences are different from yours, and thus I will not read
the book as you read the book, I will not interpret the book as you interpret
the book. I may hate it and you may love it, but the book is the book.
Once the book is
published, it is finished in my eyes. After publication, I am curious as to the
opinions of others, and of course hopeful they will be positive, but they are
not constructive opinions for the book in question. However, when I submit it
to my beta readers, I am looking for trends in the responses. If 18 out of 20
readers feel the first chapter lags, or one character is dull, then I will
reread and reconsider this material. I listen carefully to all feedback from
them, but I do not second-guess myself. It is only when the majority seem to
agree on an aspect of the book that I have overlooked or disagree with, that I
will seriously consider weighing outside opinion over my own.
When I was
younger, I was desperate to be liked and molded myself, my appearance, my
personality, my behavior, all of me, to fit the interests of those around me.
It has been a great life lesson to develop self-worth independent of external
reassurance, and to nurture the ability to give fewer f----. For this reason, I
am grateful I did not begin publishing earlier.
DAB: You’ve
developed a healthy attitude toward criticism/reviews. Do you have any writing pointers for the
authors in our audience?
CLM: I liked Stephen King’s On Writing, and would
recommend anyone interested in writing to read that.
I feel giving
advice falls under critiquing, and I don’t know how to go about it. I have
often thought that art and sex are very similar- they are both inescapably
private and public practices. You can’t turn on a shampoo advert without seeing
allusions to intercourse, just as you can’t flip through a magazine without
reading some advice about creative or personal work. And yet, regardless of the
media or the opinions of those around you, how you make art, like how you make
love, is dependent on you, who you are, what you like, what you dislike. The
world has its opinions, assumptions, expectations, and prejudices, but your
body, your work, your art, are your own. Write it, love it, share it as you
wish, knowing it will be interpreted according to the experiences of others, it
will be incorporated into these experiences, but regardless of what happens
when it reaches the public sphere, it begins and ends as your own.
DAB: Care
to tell us what is next on your writing horizon?
CLM: September and October will be devoted to a
contributed book chapter and an academic book review, both related to my
research. In winter, I will begin my second book. During the first year of my
PhD, I experienced America’s
rape culture firsthand. Having mostly recovered from that incident, I now see
what an extraordinary opportunity this is. Violence, particularly sexual
violence, is something more people experience than do not, and yet we shy from
it, we hide from it, we avoid discussing it, addressing it, or even looking at
it openly and honestly. Having experienced this myself, I am now free of the
fear of its occurrence. Therefore, my next book will be a guidebook for
communication on how to discuss the question of gendered violence. Hopefully,
it will encourage dialogue and be of benefit. I have arranged to send this to
my editor by March, and so will likely be published in the spring.
After that, I
have two novels on the horizon. The first is the beginning of a mystery series,
about which I am very excited. This will be published in time for Halloween,
2015, to correspond with the plot of the book itself. The second is a work of
literary fiction, taking place in Mongolia. I hope this will be ready
for spring, 2016.
DAB: It
take tremendous courage to approach what is such a difficult experience for far
too many. Thank you for doing so! So now’s your chance – give us the final plug
for THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH.
CLM: "...gripping, dramatic, page-turning,
emotional..." - Gut Reaction Reviews
"Beautifully
written, engaging, and highly recommended." - Vesna Wallace, Professor of
Religious Studies, University of California, Santa
Barbara
Machiko Yamamoto
pulls out her hair, picks at her skin, and triple checks the locks to the house
behind the school where she works. When a foreigner moves next door, Machiko
quickly falls in love with the quiet woman with the mangled hand.
Krista Black
does not mind the weekly visits from the local English teacher. The scarred
woman seems harmless, but she always wants to talk about travel and language
and why Krista has come to the remote, Japanese village. Krista avoids her
questions. She has seen much of the world, and she knows what it does to
fragile people. As their friendship develops, both begin to wonder how to
protect the other from themselves.
Set in Kyoto, New England, Africa, and Kathmandu, THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH is a story of trial and redemption, interwoven between two protagonists, across two cultures. In the style of SNOW FALLING ON CEDARS and THE GOD OF SMALL THINGS, it investigates the dualities of suffering and joy, religion and sex, cruelty and kindness, and the unifying power of love.
It's been a pleasure hosting you, Ms. Murphy, and thanks for sharing your insight into the writing process and characterization. When I finish my current novel, I simply must read THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH. If you are intrigued as well, dear readers, pick up a copy at Amazon.
Author Bio:
C Lynn Murphy was born in New Hampshire, but has since lived in Scotland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
England, Nepal, India, and Mongolia. She also spent a year backpacking across the African continent for kicks.
She is a doctoral candidate in Buddhist Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, as well as a graduate of St Andrews University (M.A.) and Oxford University (MPhil).
Whilst a resident at a Tibetan Buddhist nunnery in the Himalayas, she wrote her first book, 'The First Noble Truth.'
She currently lives between Mongolia and the UK, where she is conducting fieldwork on post-Soviet economies of the funeral industry and their impact on contemporary Mongolian cultural and religious identity.
She writes, she knits, she east mutton.